Thursday, June 30, 2016

Logo Research



When exploring new logo executions, the research may include any or all of the following components:
  • Logo Imagery. Imagery evoked by various logo alternatives vs. that evoked by the current logo. (This exercise usually includes the intended brand personality attributes and attributes such as “boring.”)
  • Logo Recognition. A “mock-up” of each variation of the logo is placed in its most likely usage environment (e.g., store marquis, product packaging) and then people at various distances are asked about what they see. This technique measures visibility, recognition, and the ability to break through visual clutter at various distances.
  • Logo Recall. One at a time, different logo alternatives and the current logo are mixed in with other companies’ logos on a panel. People are allowed to view the panel for a few seconds. After that, the panel is covered or taken away and they must write down all of the brands that they remember seeing. Results are compared for each variation of the logo.
  • Logo Preference. Each variation of the logo is featured on a card. People are given the deck of cards and asked to sort the logos/cards in order of preference. They are then asked to comment on why they ranked each logo variation the way they did.
At BrandForward, we conduct similar research for brand positionings, names, tag lines and messaging. 

© 2015 Brad VanAuken Excerpted from Brand Aid, second edition, available here and here.

Monday, June 27, 2016

Online Brand Building



Key considerations in online brand building:
  • When building brands online, content is king. If your brand is not associated with continuous stream of useful or entertaining content, it will be taken far less seriously.
  • The online medium invites feedback and engagement. Build this into your brand’s online experience.
  • Visuals (including videos) are becoming increasingly important to any online brand experience.
  • An important benefit of the online medium is that it makes it possible for your brand’s messages to go viral. There are specific strategies and tools to help you initiate and accelerate this viral process.
  • As with any other brand activity, you must start by defining your target audiences.
  • Furthermore, your brand must have a unique value proposition and you must be very clear about your brand’s promise.


In the Online Brand Building chapter of my Brand Aid book, I focus on eleven key components of online brand building:
  • The Brand Website
  • The Importance of Content
  • The Power of Blogs
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  • Online Advertising
  • Using Social Media
  • Web Analytics
  • E-Mail Marketing
  • Online Public Relations
  • Mobile Apps
  • QR Codes


© 2015 Brad VanAuken Excerpted from Brand Aid, second edition, available here and here.



Brands & Price Sensitivity



It is extremely important to be able to estimate the impact of price changes on sales and profits. That is, it is important to know how a price change will impact consumer response, competitive response, and unit volume. Many businesspeople erroneously believe that a price increase is the most cost-effective revenue-generating marketing tactic. I have heard generally intelligent professionals share their excitement about how a price increase will drop to the “bottom line” dollar-for-dollar. Most of the time, this is simply not true.

People display different price sensitivities to different products in different situations. Often people are relatively price insensitive, but only within a relevant price range. Once a price exceeds that range, people become very sensitive. Raising the price across that threshold is akin to walking off a cliff.

Factors That Decrease Price Sensitivity
  • Relevant brand/product differentiation.
  • Marketing and selling on factors other than price.
  • Convincing consumers that quality differs significantly among products and brands in the category.
  • Self-expressive or “image” products or brands. (For example, if I wear sports apparel featuring Nike’s swoosh logo, it implies I have the “Just do it” attitude of Nike’s “authentic athletic performance” essence. If I carry a Gucci handbag or wear a Rolex watch or drive a Mercedes-Benz, it says I have social status. If I wear a Harvard ball cap, it says I am extremely smart and successful; and if I wear a Harley-Davidson tattoo, it says that I know the freedom of the road, that I am a free spirit.)
  • Brand advertising.
  • Situations in which price is a signal to quality—usually for relatively new or unknown products or brands.
  • When it is difficult to ascertain a “reference price” within the category.
  • When there are significant switching costs—in dollars, time, effort, risk, or emotional impact.
  • Product categories for which the risk of failure is an important issue.
  • When the price is insignificant relative to the total budget or discretionary income.
  • When the item does not significantly contribute to the cost of the products and services that a business sells.
  • When the price falls within the expected price range for products in the category.
  • When offering “value-added services” vs. “price discounts” to motivate purchases.
  • New markets.

Factors That Increase Price Sensitivity
  • Price promotions, especially when people are able to stock up on the price-discounted items
  • Mature and declining markets

© 2015 Brad VanAuken Excerpted from Brand Aid, second edition, available here and here.

Friday, June 24, 2016

Donald Trump Brand Personality




I am conducting an online survey to better understand Donald Trump's brand personality. I will report the results on this blog when the survey is complete. Please help me spread this survey throughout the Internet as I want to have as large a sample size as possible with as diverse a set of respondents as possible. Later I will look at the impact of Donald Trump's changing personality perceptions on the Trump brand and its equity. Thank you for helping me with this. 

Here is the LINK to the survey. 

Thursday, June 23, 2016

When to Reposition a Brand



Brand repositioning is necessary if one or more of these conditions exist:
  • Your brand has a bad, confusing, or nonexistent image.
  • The primary benefit your brand “owns” has evolved from a differentiating benefit to a cost-of-entry benefit. (For example, for airlines cost-of-entry benefits would be safe flights, needed routes, and required times.)
  • Your organization is significantly altering its strategic direction.
  • Your organization is entering new businesses and the current positioning is no longer appropriate.
  • A new competitor with a superior value proposition is entering your industry.
  • Competition has usurped your brand’s position or made it ineffectual.
  • Your organization has acquired a very powerful proprietary advantage that must be worked into the brand positioning.
  • Corporate culture renewal dictates at least a revision of the brand personality.
  • You are broadening your brand to appeal to additional consumers or consumer need segments for whom the current brand positioning won’t work. (This should be a “red flag” since it could dilute the brand’s meaning or make it less appealing to current customers or even alienate them.)

You follow the same steps and address the same brand design components when repositioning a brand as you do when first designing the brand. But, brand repositioning is more difficult than initially positioning a brand because you must first help the customer “unlearn” the current brand positioning (easier said than done). 

© 2015 Brad VanAuken Excerpted from Brand Aid, second edition, available here and here.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Brand Equity



Brand equity is the commercial value of all associations and expectations (positive and negative) that people have of an organization and its products and services due to all experiences of, communications with, and perceptions of the brand over time. This value can be measured in several ways: as the economic value of the brand asset itself, as the price premium (to the end consumer or the trade) that the brand commands, as the long-term consumer loyalty the brand evokes, or as the market share gains it results in, among many others. From an economist’s perspective, brand equity is the power of the brand to shift the consumer demand curve of a product or service (to achieve a price premium or a market share gain).

To use a metaphor, brand equity is like a pond. People may not know how long the pond has been around or when it first filled with water, but they know that it supports life, from ducks to deer. It also may provide recreation, irrigation, even human drinking water. Clearly it is a valuable resource. But many people take the pond for granted. It seems as if nothing can diminish its supply of water, yet we sometimes notice that it rises with the spring rains or lowers after a long drought or overuse for irrigation.

Similarly, brand equity is a reservoir of goodwill. Brand building activities consistently pursued over time will ensure that the reservoir remains full. Neglecting those activities or taking actions that might deplete those reserves will reduce the reservoir, imperceptibly at first, but soon all too noticeably until it is too late and all that is left is mud.

This illustrates a chronic difficulty in brand management. Brand equity is critically important to a company’s success, yet because of its reservoir-like nature, it is often taken for granted, overly drawn upon, and not adequately replenished, especially in times of crisis or to meet short-term needs.

© 2015 Brad VanAuken Excerpted from Brand Aid, second edition, available here and here.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Brands and Memory Triggers

Brands are encoded into memory and decoded from memory using a variety of triggers. Often, specific emotions are also encoded in the brain associated with those triggers. The triggers can be images, colors, shapes, textures, sounds, scents, flavors, attitudes, personalities, voices, characters and other distinctive brand elements.

Consider what triggers exist for each of the following brands:

  • Coca-Cola
  • Apple
  • GEICO
  • Harley-Davidson
  • Cinnabon
What triggers exist for your brand? Are you using them consistently? Are they associated with specific emotions?