Showing posts with label Ivanka Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ivanka Trump. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

The Donald Trump Brand - Our Research Results



Donald Trump has estimated his net worth to be in the billions of dollars, mostly based on the brand value of his last name. Prior to Donald Trump’s run for president of the United States, the Trump brand stood for luxury, success, risk taking and fearlessness.

Now that Donald Trump is the Republican nominee for president, we wanted to determine if his campaigning has changed his brand perceptions. To that end, we conducted a nationwide online survey between June 24 and July 4 to better understand Donald Trump’s brand perceptions. We asked 300 people how well each of 115 personality attributes described him. We compiled these attributes from articles written about Donald Trump combined with our battery of standard brand personality attributes. Here is what we found:
  • No one perceives him to be shy
  • Few view him to be subtle and very few perceive him to be politically correct
  • Most everyone perceives him to be confident and outspoken
  • Almost everyone identifies him as ambitious and a businessman
  • Most identify him as rich and a billionaire

This is where the agreement ends. We found significant differences in brand personality perceptions by political party affinity, educational attainment and, to a lessor extent, household income level.  We also found that people who were unemployed and looking for work and those disabled and unable to work had much more positive perceptions of Donald Trump than people who were employed and those who were unemployed by choice. Interestingly, there were very few differences in perceptions by gender.

Republicans primarily described him using these words (in decreasing order):
  • Businessman
  • Hard working
  • Successful
  • Confident
  • Leader
  • Strong
  • Real
  • Entrepreneurial
  • Competent
  • Ambitious
  • Rich
  • Positive
  • Energetic
  • Passionate
  • Professional
  • Loyal
  • Billionaire
  • Interesting
  • Good
  • Smart
  • Responsible
  • Brave
  • Honest
  • Reliable
  • Inspiring
  • Outspoken
  • Trustworthy
  • Dependable

And they used many more positive words and almost no negative words to describe him.

While Democrats primarily described him as (in decreasing order):
  • Outspoken
  • Egotistical
  • Narcissist
  • Loud
  • Bully
  • Rude
  • Greedy
  • Sexist
  • Bigoted
  • Dangerous
  • Intolerant
  • Superficial
  • Selfish
  • Pretentious
  • Narrow-minded
  • Ambitious
  • Crass
  • Ill-mannered
  • Angry
  • Boorish
  • Impulsive
  • Confident
  • Huckster
  • Elitist
  • Fraud

 People with less than a college bachelor’s degree described him as:
  • Businessman
  • Ambitious
  • Hard working
  • Confident
  • Successful
  • Outspoken
  • Rich
  • Entrepreneurial
  • Billionaire
  • Leader
  • Real

 While people with a bachelor’s degree or greater described him as:
  • Outspoken
  • Egotistical
  • Ambitious
  • Confident
  • Loud
  • Crass
  • Narcissist
  • Impulsive
  • Rude

 People with household incomes of $74,999 or less described him as:
  • Outspoken
  • Ambitious
  • Confident
  • Businessman
  • Rich
  • Successful
  • Hard working
  • Entrepreneurial
  • Billionaire
  • Passionate

 While people with household incomes of $175,000 or more described him as:
  • Confident
  • Ambitious
  • Outspoken
  • Egotistical
  • Businessman
  • Loud
  • Flashy
  • Entrepreneurial
  • Rich
  • Authoritarian
  • Crass
  • Energetic

In summary, those who (a) are Republican, (b) have less than a college bachelor’s degree and (c) more modest household incomes and (d) are unemployed looking for work view Donald Trump as a rich, successful, outspoken businessman who has many positive traits. Put another way, Republicans and those who are less successful have positive perceptions of Donald Trump. Those who are Democratic, and are fully employed with higher educational attainment and income view Donald Trump in a very negative light. The first groups would view the Trump brand similar to historical brand associations, while the latter groups have mostly negative perceptions of the Trump brand.

The data would indicate that his style and demeanor appeal more to people who are less well educated and who have more modest incomes. For instance, more highly educated people and people with higher incomes perceive him to be loud, while people with less education and lower incomes do not. Crass and other negative adjectives follow the same pattern, while likeable and other positive adjectives follow the opposite pattern.

If I were a Republican brand strategist, I would focus on Donald Trump’s bulldog qualities and his ability to “get the job done” on behalf of those who are fed up with the status quo.  If I were a Democratic brand strategist, I would focus on Donald Trump’s narcissism and propensity to operate only in his own self-interest and I would present evidence that he is not nearly as competent and successful as he portrays himself to be.

Interesting branding questions that emerge from this study are:
  • Is all publicity good publicity?
  • Does the extremely high awareness of the Trump name mostly help Trump, even if recent polls show that approximately 60% of US citizens have negative perceptions of Donald Trump? Which is more important, brand awareness or brand perceptions?
  • Will these negative perceptions of Donald Trump affect his ability to license his name for royalty income?
  • How does this affect the asset value of the Trump brand?
  • Does this affect the Ivanka Trump brand, and if so, in what ways?

For more information regarding the results of this survey, contact Brad VanAuken, president of BrandForward, Inc. at vanauken@brandforward.com.
SaveSave

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Ivanka Trump


I had an interesting conversation with someone yesterday. She had tried on a dress at a women’s clothing store and really liked the way it looked on her. Curious about the brand, she looked at the label and discovered that it was labeled Ivanka Trump. She told me that she just couldn’t bear wearing something with the Trump name on it so she put it back and left the store without buying it.

As a brand consultant, this was interesting to me. Ivanka Trump deliberately chose a label that featured the Trump name so that it could draw from and contribute to the Trump brand equity.  As the Trump name is becoming more well known with Donald Trump’s run for the GOP presidential nomination, awareness of the Trump name is increasing but the Trump name is also taking on more positive and negative associations, depending on one’s view of Donald Trump, his values, his personality and his position on issues.

So, extending the Trump brand into politics has perhaps made the brand more interesting for some and less palatable for others. The woman with whom I had this conversation really liked the dress itself (the product) but couldn’t stand being associated with Trump (the brand). This is a clear example of how a brand can add to or subtract from the appeal of products or services. In this case, a sale was lost due to the brand name. I suspect that the Ivanka Trump name helps more than it hurts sales as it creates immediate recognition. Having said that, it clearly stands for something other than quality for some people.

Any time one extends a brand into a new category (in this case, politics), the brand's associations in that category can have an impact on the brand’s perceptions in other categories.